Skip to Main Content

"Manifest Destiny: An American Indian Perspective" Informational/Explanatory Writing

LDC Task

"Manifest Destiny: An American Indian Perspective" Informational/Explanatory Writing

Grade Levels

10th Grade, 11th Grade, 12th Grade, 9th Grade

Course, Subject

English Composition, US History 1850-Present, Civics and Government, Geography
Related Academic Standards
Expand
  • Big Ideas
    Purpose, topic and audience guide types of writing
    Writing is a means of documenting thinking
    Writing is a recursive process that conveys ideas, thoughts and feelings
    Historical context is needed to comprehend time and space.
    Historical interpretation involves an analysis of cause and result.
    Perspective helps to define the attributes of historical comprehension.
    The history of the United States continues to influence its citizens, and has impacted the rest of the world.
  • Concepts
    Focus, content, organization, style, and conventions work together to impact writing quality
    Informational writing describes, explains and/or summarizes ideas or content in a variety of genre.
    The writing supports a thesis or research question based on research, observation, and/or experience.
    Biography is a historical construct used to reveal positive and/or negative influences an individual can have on the United States society.
    Comprehension of the experiences of individuals, society, and how past human experience has adapted builds aptitude to apply to civic participation.
    Conflict and cooperation among social groups, organizations, and nation-states are critical to comprehending society in the United States. Domestic instability, ethnic and racial relations, labor relation, immigration, and wars and revolutions are examples of social disagreement and collaboration.
    Conflict and cooperation among social groups, organizations, and nation-states are critical to comprehending the American society.
    Historical causation involves motives, reasons, and consequences that result in events and actions.
    Historical causation involves motives, reasons, and consequences that result in events and actions. Some consequences may be impacted by forces of the irrational or the accidental.
    Historical comprehension involves evidence-based discussion and explanation, an analysis of sources including multiple points of view, and an ability to read critically to recognize fact from conjecture and evidence from assertion.
    Historical literacy requires a focus on time and space, and an understanding of the historical context of events and actions.
    Historical literacy requires a focus on time and space, and an understanding of the historical context, as well as an awareness of point of view.
    Historical skills (organizing information chronologically, explaining historical issues, locating sources and investigate materials, synthesizing and evaluating evidence, and developing arguments and interpretations based on evidence) are used by an analytical thinker to create a historical construction.
    Human organizations work to socialize members and, even though there is a constancy of purpose, changes occur over time.
    Learning about the past and its different contexts shaped by social, cultural, and political influences prepares one for participation as active, critical citizens in a democratic society.
    Long-term continuities and discontinuities in the structures of United States culture provide vital contributions to contemporary issues.
    Long-term continuities and discontinuities in the structures of United States society provide vital contributions to contemporary issues. Belief systems and religion, commerce and industry, innovations, settlement patterns, social organization, transportation and trade, and equality are examples continuity and change.
    Social entities clash over disagreement and assist each other when advantageous.
    Textual evidence, material artifacts, the built environment, and historic sites are central to understanding United States history.
    United States history can offer an individual discerning judgment in public and personal life, supply examples for living, and thinking about one’s self in the dimensions of time and space.
    United States history can offer an individual judicious understanding about one’s self in the dimensions of time and space.
  • Competencies
    Identify a single thesis, research question or topic. Attribute sources of information when appropriate. Use information in maps, charts, graphs, time lines, tables and diagrams to inform writing.
    Incorporate an expansive and expressive vocabulary that includes terms specific to the topic
    Informational Writing: Develop substantial, relevant and illustrative content that demonstrates a clear understanding of the purpose (content).
    Informational Writing: Employ effective organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, which develop a controlling idea (organization).
    Write to inform by: • presenting information purposefully and succinctly to meet the needs of the intended audience. • applying organizational structures that communicate information and ideas accurately and coherently. • using language that qualifies fact from opinion. • developing informational genres that relate to a variety of purposes and audiences (e.g.: instructions, memos, e-mails, correspondence, project plans, proposals, and resumes).
    Write to inform by: • presenting information purposefully and succinctly to meet the needs of the intended audience. • applying organizational structures that communicate information and ideas accurately and coherently. • using language that qualifies fact from opinion. • communicating quantitative and qualitative technical information and concepts from primary and secondary sources accurately and coherently. • using language that qualifies evidence from inference. • developing informational genres that relate to a variety of purposes and audiences (e.g.: instructions, memos, e-mails, correspondence, project plans, proposals, and resumes).
    Focus, content, organization, style, and conventions work together to impact writing quality
    Analyze a primary source for accuracy and bias and connect it to a time and place in United States history.
    Analyze the interaction of cultural, economic, geographic, political, and social relations for a specific time and place.
    Apply the theme of continuity and change in United States history and relate the benefits and drawbacks of your example.
    Articulate the context of a historical event or action.
    Construct a biography of an American and generate conclusions regarding his/her qualities and limitations.
    Contrast how a historically important issue in the United States was resolved and compare what techniques and decisions may be applied today.
    Contrast multiple perspectives of individuals and groups in interpreting other times, cultures, and place.
    Evaluate cause-and-result relationships bearing in mind multiple causations.
    Summarize how conflict and compromise in United States history impact contemporary society.
    Synthesize a rationale for the study of individuals in United States history.
    Use information in maps, charts, graphs, time lines, tables, and diagrams to inform writing.

Description

The Literacy Design Collaborative teaching task provides a blueprint for seamlessly integrating literacy and content standards in a rigorous, authentic classroom experience. After determining the discipline, course, and grade level, educators use teaching tasks built around predefined template prompts. The teaching task requires students to read, analyze and comprehend written materials and then write cogent arguments, explanations or narratives in the subjects they are studying.

 

Students are often taught about the assimilation or annihilation of American Indians through treaties, military actions, and/or events like Wounded Knee, 1890.  However, students rarely learn about this struggle from an American Indian perspective.  Students will use primary source documents that focus on the American Indian voice, students will understand how manifest destiny impacted Plains Indians religious beliefs, hunting economy, and relationship with American settlers.

Objectives

In this extended writing task, students will read, analyze, and gather relevant information from text(s) and write an informational essay.

Students will

  • Define Manifest Destiny
  • Describe how Maniefest Destiny impacted the Plains Indians
  • Read and analyze relevant information from a primary/secondary sources
  • Cite evidence from primary/secondary sources
  • Write an informational/explanatory report

 

Vocabulary

annuities - an annual or yearly payment; often, when Indians signed treaties, the U.S. government would exchange goods for the use of Indian land - this occurred in Treaty of Fort Laramie 1852

assimilation - to make similar or to absorb into a culture

Manifest Destiny - an ideal or belief in the 19th century that suggested Americans had the god-given right to expand westward across the continent.  

Duration

350 minutes/7 periods

Materials

Textbook resources

  • Black Elk. Black Elk Speaks.  Trans. John G. Neihardt. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, 1932.
  • Excerpt from Black Elk Speaks, Chapter 21 “The Messiah,” pp. 230, 232-233, 237; Chapter 22 “Visions of the Other World,” p. 243; Chapter 23 “Bad Trouble Coming,” pp. 248-249, 253-254; Chapter 24 “The Butchering at Wounded Knee” p. 255-262 Excerpts found in PDF format at: http://vitaushistory.wikispaces.com/LDC

Photographs


Related Materials & Resources

  • “Song of a soldier regarding Ghost Dance ending and Wounded Knee” https://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/resources/archives/eight/wkballad.htm L2 students who are trying to make implications can use more sources and compare the 7th cavalry’s viewpoint and the American Indian viewpoint
  • Video from 500 Nations “Wounded Knee - The Darkest Hour” May help students visualize the Ghost Dance Movement and Wounded Knee 1890 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkJaYe1T8l8
  • “Lakota Accounts of the Massacre at Wounded Knee” https://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/resources/archives/eight/wklakota.htm From the Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs for 1891, volume 1, pages 179-181. Extracts from verbatim stenographic report of council held by delegations of Sioux with Commissioner of Indian Affairs, at Washington, February 11, 1891.
  • "Massacre At Wounded Knee, 1890," EyeWitness to History, http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/knee.htm (1998).  Includes excerpts from Dee Brown, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee (1971); Richard Jensen, et. al, Eyewitness at Wounded Knee (1991); Robert M. Utley, The Last Days of the Sioux Nation (1963); Philip Wells, "Ninety-six Years among the Indians of the Northwest", North Dakota History, 15, no. 2 (1948).
  • Mooney, James. The Ghost-dance Religion and the Sioux Outbreak of 1890, “Barracks Ballad by Pvt. W. H. Prather, an African-American member of the Ninth Cavalry. Composed and popular among the troops during the "Sioux Outbreak" campaign of 1890.”  14th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Part 2, 1896.

Suggested Instructional Strategies

W:

The students will analyze and discuss the teaching task to identify what the task is asking them to do and to help students access background knowledge. Sample student papers or texts will be used as models. Students will work with the teacher to interpret the Literacy Design Collaborative rubric.

H:

The teaching task, which is both relevant and rigorous, engages students in subject specific reading, research, and writing. The teaching task requires the application of content knowledge to a new scenario.

E:

The teacher will engage students through reading and discussion, note-taking, and the development of a rough draft of the assignment.

R:

Students will use active reading strategies (e.g., "Talking to the text"), discussion protocols (e.g., think-pair-share, Paideia/Socratic seminar), and writing strategies (e.g., peer editing, teacher modeling and guided practice) with appropriate scaffolds as they develop their final written product.

E:

The students will create an extended writing assignment which incorporates both their content understanding and text-based information. The Literacy Design Collaborative rubric will be used to provide feedback to students.

T:

The Literacy Design Collaborative teaching task is a tiered assignment. Individual tasks can be made simple or complex by varying the task demand, with up to three tiers of difficulty. For leveled tasks, teachers can choose to teach Level 1 (L1) alone or add demands to the prompt by including Level 2 (L2) and/or Level 3 (L3).

  • Level 1 (L1) refers to the most fundamental levels of difficulty.
  • Level 2 (L2) refers to a "next step-up" skill or cognitive demand.
  • Level 3 (L3) adds additional demand to the task in which writers are asked to make connections and use background knowledge.
O:

The teaching task is designed to help students apply subject area content through reading and writing. The teaching task might be sequenced toward the end of a content unit. The teaching task is an extended, multiple day classroom assignment.

Instructional Procedures

Teacher Preparation
Prior to launching the teaching task in the classroom, a teacher should consider the following questions:

 

How much support will students need to successfully complete the task?

 

What parts of the process can be completed independently (during or outside of class)? What parts of the process represent new learning or substantial challenge and warrant direct instruction or guided practice during class?

 

What content and vocabulary instruction and activities will be provided so that students are able to successfully complete the task?

 

How will reading be scaffolded for my students? (Read together? Read in groups? Read independently?)

 

What note-taking method will students use, and does that method align with the writing task?

 

How will students make the transition from the reading to the writing? (outline, graphic organizer, etc.)

 

What writing instruction is needed to help students write their thesis statements, organize their notes, embed quotes, and cite evidence?

 

How will students receive feedback at various stages of the writing process to make sure they are answering the prompt, their papers are focused, their ideas are fully developed with details, examples, etc.?

 

Daily Plan
The daily plan is flexible based on students' prior knowledge, experience and skills in reading, research and writing as well as their ability to apply subject area knowledge to a new scenario. The amount of time, in class instruction, and scaffolds needed can be increased or decreased to provide the appropriate level of challenge and support for students.

 

Teaching Task

Task 11B (Informational or Explanatory/Definition, L1, L2):  After researching primary and secondary sources and viewing photographs of Wounded Knee, write an essay that defines Manifest Destiny and explains its impact on American Indian culture. L2 Support your discussion with evidence from your research.

Day 1

Task Engagement and Analysis
The teacher introduces the teaching task to students by linking the task to the class content that has been taught previously and to existing knowledge, skills, and interests. The teacher asks students to read the teaching task and make notes or discuss with peers things they already know about this issue or topic.

The teacher helps the students to understand the expectations of the teaching task by asking students what they think a good response to the task might include and creating a classroom list. The teacher may share examples of the type of texts the students will produce (either actual student samples or commercially published texts).  Sharing the rubric with students will clarify the expectations. 

The teacher explains the timetable and supports available for completing the task.

Text Selection
The teacher has either preselected the texts or will provide access to research sources for students to select texts. The teacher asks students to begin to record information about the sources (e.g., using notebooks, note cards, technology, etc.). The teacher may need to provide models or instruction on creating a bibliography or works cited. The students should identify author, title, publisher, date, and any other needed information (e.g., volume, editor).  A discussion about the credibility or merit of sources may be needed.

 

Days 2-3

Preview texts
The teacher can provide students with all of the texts or offer students a list of acceptable sources from which to choose. The teacher briefly highlights each text with a summary to assist students in making appropriate text selections. The teacher asks the students to skim through each text to identify the genre, purpose, and text structure. A teacher think-aloud explaining rationale for making certain text selections may be beneficial to students.

Note-taking
The teacher provides or suggests that a note-taking method be used that is consistent with the expectations for the task and the type of writing (e.g., argumentative-pro/con t-chart). Students should be encouraged to refer to the teaching task so that their notes are relevant to the prompt. Students should be encouraged to include both textual information and their own connections and implications. Students should continue to add to their bibliography or works cited.

Teachers may need to teach or reinforce practices to promote academic integrity and to help students avoid plagiarism. The ability to use and credit sources appropriately shows respect for the work of others and adds credibility to a student's argument and/or research.

Reading and Research
The teacher assigns the reading, research and note-taking to students and provides instruction to support analysis and synthesis of texts. The teacher may ask students to reflect orally or in writing on key questions including:

 

Which parts of the text provide evidence that relates to the prompt?

 

What historical or current examples did you notice that relate to the prompt?

 

What is the text explicitly saying? What gaps or unanswered questions do you see?

 

What competing arguments have you encountered or thought of based on the text (argumentative)?

 

How do you know your sources are credible?

 

Depending upon the needs of students in the classroom, additional scaffolds may be necessary (e.g. whole-group reading and teacher modeling of note-taking, paired in-class reading, talking to the text, small group discussion). The teacher may either provide students with print source options or make electronic texts available to them through the use of Web 2.0 tools (e.g., Wikis, Nings) or online library databases (e.g., EBSCO, ProQuest).

 

Day 4

Transition to Writing
The teacher uses discussion based strategies such as the Paideia/Socratic seminar or small group discussions to help students make connections between their research and notes and the teaching task.

Developing a Thesis or Claim
Students write an opening paragraph that includes a controlling idea and sequences the key points that will be made throughout the writing assignment. The teacher may provide models of opening paragraphs and analyze them with the class. Students may provide feedback to each other on their opening paragraphs. Students should compare their opening paragraph to the teaching task and assess whether the paragraph fully address the main points of the prompt (e.g., define and explain, compare, take a position).

Organizing Notes/Planning
Students organize their notes into a graphic organizer or outline that establish a logical structure for the assignment. An outline begins with the thesis or claim, sequences key points and includes supporting evidence from texts.

 

Days 5-6

Development of rough drafts
Students begin writing their rough drafts. The teacher frequently checks in with students to answer questions, offer feedback, and provide writing instruction as needed. Through planning, the teacher embeds opportunities for students to receive feedback on their writing prior to the submission of the final draft either through peer conferencing, teacher conferencing, or written teacher feedback. Students revise their drafts based on the feedback they receive. The amount of time needed for the development of rough draft varies and may include time during and outside of class.

 

Day 7

Completion of Final Draft
Students either self or peer-edit their papers for conventional errors and complete the final draft.

Assessment and Reflection
The teacher uses the LDC rubric to assess the students' writing and provide feedback to help students improve their performance. Patterns in student performance guide further instruction.

Analytic Scoring
The rubric is structured to facilitate analytic scoring - the awarding of separate scores by readers for each of the seven scoring elements. Scorers should keep in mind that the description of work quality within any particular "cell" of the rubric may still address more than one idea, and therefore may not match a particular essay perfectly. The scorer must identify the descriptor that is the best match to a paper based on the preponderance of evidence. If the decision is truly a "coin toss," the scorer should feel free to use the "in-between" or "half" scores. A variation of analytic scoring might be used in a situation in which the emphasis of instruction at a particular time might be on a subset of the seven scoring elements. For example, if instruction is focused on development and organization, then a teacher might simply award scores for those two scoring elements.

Holistic Scoring
Holistic scoring is assigning a single, overall score to a paper. Analytic and holistic scoring rubrics look much the same. The holistic scorer's job is to pick the single score (1, 2, 3, 4) that corresponds to the set of descriptors for scoring elements that best matches a paper. Again, in-between or half scores can be used. Ideally, holistic scorers are thinking about all the scoring elements as they read papers, but over time they find that they can assign holistic scores very rapidly, yet still fairly accurately. This is one of the advantages of holistic scoring. However, analytic information is not generated by this method.

Score Recording and Feedback
It would be good practice for teachers to share the rubrics with students and discuss "criteria for success" relative to the scoring elements. However, it is not intended that a clean scoring rubric would be attached to every paper that is scored in all situations. It might be more appropriate to attach score slips that list the scoring element names with blank spaces after them for the recording of scores (and a space for a total score, too, perhaps). A customized rubber stamp could accomplish the same. Analytic scores do provide useful information to the students since they reference descriptors in the rubric. However, nothing beats descriptive comments that are best written in the margins of the papers where they are most appropriate.

Cut Scores for Proficiency Levels
Scorers can readily compute a total score (the sum of the seven element scores) or an average score (that sum divided by 7). If translating scores to performance levels is desired, then the structure of the rubrics lends itself to the use of the following cut scores:

Performance Level Total Score Cut* Average Score Cut*
Not Yet 10.5 1.5
Approaches Expectations 17.5 2.5
Meets Expectations 24.5 3.5
Advanced N/A N/A
* The cut scores above are the highest scores possible within their associated performance levels. To score at the Advanced level, a student would have to earn more than 24.5 total points or an average score greater than 3.5 points. The highest scores possible for Advanced (28 and 4.0) are not cut scores because there is no higher performance level than Advanced.

LDC Scores and Grades
LDC scores could be translated to grades contributing to students' course grades. How this would be done is an individual teacher's decision. Teachers could establish their own cut scores for letter grades or just re-label the four performance levels as A, B, C, D. They could come up with their own way to convert LDC scores to numerical grades consistent with whatever numerical scale they use for other class work.

Rubric

 

Not Yet

Approaches Expectations

Meets Expectations

Advanced

Scoring Elements

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Focus

 

Attempts to address prompt, but lacks focus or is off-task.

 

Addresses prompt appropriately, but with a weak or uneven focus.

 

Addresses prompt appropriately and maintains a clear, steady focus.

 

Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately and maintains a strongly developed focus.

 

Reading/ Research

 

Attempts to present information in response to the prompt, but lacks connections or relevance to the purpose of the prompt.

(L2) Does not address the credibility of sources as prompted.

 

Presents information from reading materials relevant to the purpose of the prompt with minor lapses in accuracy or completeness.

(L2) Begins to address the credibility of sources when prompted.

 

Presents information from reading materials relevant to the prompt with accuracy and sufficient detail.

(L2) Addresses the credibility of sources when prompted.

 

Accurately presents information relevant to all parts of the prompt with effective selection of sources and details from reading materials.

(L2) Addresses the credibility of sources and identifies salient sources when prompted.

 

Controlling Idea

 

Attempts to establish a controlling idea, but lacks a clear purpose.

 

Establishes a controlling idea with a general purpose.

 

Establishes a controlling idea with a clear purpose maintained throughout the response.

 

Establishes a strong controlling idea with a clear purpose maintained throughout the response.

 

Development

 

Attempts to provide details in response to the prompt, including retelling, but lacks sufficient development or relevancy.

(L2) Implication is missing, irrelevant, or illogical.

(L3) Gap/unanswered question is missing or irrelevant.

 

Presents appropriate details to support the focus and controlling idea.

(L2) Briefly notes a relevant implication or

(L3) a relevant gap/unanswered question.

 

Presents appropriate and sufficient details to support the focus and controlling idea.

(L2) Explains relevant and plausible implications, and

(L3) a relevant gap/unanswered question.

 

Presents thorough and detailed information to strongly support the focus and controlling idea.

(L2) Thoroughly discusses relevant and salient implications or consequences, and

(L3) one or more significant gaps/unanswered questions.

 

Organization

 

Attempts to organize ideas, but lacks control of structure.

 

Uses an appropriate organizational structure to address the specific requirements of the prompt, with some lapses in coherence or awkward use of the organizational structure

 

Maintains an appropriate organizational structure to address the specific requirements of the prompt.

 

Maintains an organizational structure that intentionally and effectively enhances the presentation of information as required by the specific prompt.

 

Conventions

 

Attempts to demonstrate standard English conventions, but lacks cohesion and control of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Sources are used without citation.

 

Demonstrates an uneven command of standard English conventions and cohesion. Accuracy and/or appropriateness of language and tone is uneven. Inconsistently cites sources.

 

Demonstrates a command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Cites sources using an appropriate format with only minor errors.

 

Demonstrates and maintains a well-developed command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone consistently appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Consistently cites sources using an appropriate format.

Content Understanding

 

Attempts to include disciplinary content in explanations, but understanding of content is weak; content is irrelevant, inappropriate, or inaccurate.

 

Briefly notes disciplinary content relevant to the prompt; shows basic or uneven understanding of content; minor errors in explanation.

 

Accurately presents disciplinary content relevant to the prompt with sufficient explanations that demonstrate understanding.

 

Integrates relevant and accurate disciplinary content with thorough explanations that demonstrate in-depth understanding.

                     

Author

Maria Vita, Penn Manor School District

Content Collections

Loading
Please wait...